Panic in the rear Ukraine’s drones are reaching farther than ever, and Russia’s advance has slowed, but the conditions for the maneuver warfare that could end the war remain out of reach for both armies
Greetings! We’re working on some significant changes to Meduza’s newsletter and will share details soon. In the meantime, please enjoy today’s mailing.
Ukrainian drones are now striking targets well beyond the front, hitting the highway running through Mariupol to Crimea, pounding Donetsk and Gorlivka, and reaching logistics nodes that Russian forces had long considered safe. Russian pro-war bloggers are sounding alarms. Some Western commentators have called it a turning point, claiming that Ukraine has regained the initiative and that Russia’s grinding advance may be stalling.
However, a new analysis by Meduza’s military experts cautions that tactical drone advantage and strategic breakthrough are different things, and neither Moscow nor Kyiv has yet bridged the gap.
What drones have done to the battlefield
Over the past two years, the proliferation of cheap FPV (First-Person View) drones has emptied the front of massed infantry and driven back artillery and other heavy equipment. Mechanized assaults are now nearly impossible. Both sides have retreated to the “middle rear” — a zone 20–50 kilometers (12.5–31 miles) behind the contact line — and reorganized around small infiltration groups. Soldiers advance in pairs and threes rather than companies and battalions, managed by commanders watching drone feeds in real time, “literally like pieces in a video game,” Meduza’s analysts write.
Small groups can gain ground, but neither side can concentrate the force needed to break through at depth. Military doctrines developed before this war relied on massed armor, concentrated infantry, and sustained fire support, but none of that is available on Ukraine’s front lines now.
Kyiv’s partial solution
Ukraine has responded to the middle-rear targeting problem with a class of drones that can strike up to 100 kilometers (62 miles) beyond the front. “Hornet” attack drones reportedly developed by a U.S.-based company owned by former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, alongside German and Ukrainian equivalents, combine MESH relay networks for range with machine vision for guidance. An operator selects the target, a relay chain carries the signal, and the drone autonomously closes the last few hundred meters. These AI-enabled weapons have extended the Ukrainian military’s reach into occupied territories, such as Gorlivka, Donetsk, and the Mariupol-Crimea highway, spreading panic among Russian milbloggers.
Russia has identified the same middle-rear targeting problem and attempted its own solution. Using long-range Geran and Gerber drones guided by Starlink terminals, the Defense Ministry’s lead drone unit struck moving vehicles on the Pokrovsk-Dnipro supply road — one of Ukraine’s main logistics arteries. The experiment ended when, at Ukraine’s request, Elon Musk’s company deregistered unauthorized Starlink terminals. Russia pivoted to MESH relay networks, but this only partially solved the range problem: Moscow still could not reliably guide drones in the last few hundred meters, and its experiments with autonomous terminal guidance on Lancet drones actually reduced accuracy against moving, camouflaged targets.
Flower Power against the Kremlin
Anyone who lives in Russia (or even travels there) risks felony charges for donating to an outlawed “undesirable” organization. That’s why our Flower Power crowdfunding campaign is designed to connect our millions of readers inside the country with those of you around the world. It’s a dark time for independent journalism globally, but together you can make a difference and help Meduza survive.
We’ve gathered requests from readers who can’t support Meduza safely, and assigned each of them a botanical code name, inspired by the anti-Nazi German resistance group the White Rose. Please read their heartfelt messages, sponsor an appeal that speaks to you, and help us show the Kremlin why “Flower Power” is an anti-war slogan. 🌼
Read Meduza’s full letter to readers here.
The doctrine problem
Ukrainian commanders have a theoretical solution: identify enemy drone operators, electronic warfare systems, and command nodes; fix them in place; strike to degrade them; and push infantry through the gap. Kyiv has tested this approach near Kupyansk and along the Zaporizhzhia-Dnipropetrovsk boundary, where Ukrainian forces achieved gains of roughly 10 kilometers (6 miles). Both times, however, Russian reserves arrived before the gains could be consolidated.
Moscow ran its own experiment around Pokrovsk. Working with Rubikon, the Defense Ministry’s lead drone unit, the Central grouping mapped drone coverage across the front and middle rear and tied it directly to infantry. The tactic yielded some results: Pokrovsk fell, and Russian forces advanced up to 15 kilometers (9.3 miles), but then the advance stalled. That was nearly five months ago.
The limits of Ukraine’s current advantage
Kyiv’s stated aim is to exhaust Russian recruitment and make the war felt inside Russia, where the Kremlin still tries to insulate civilian life from the war. Ukrainian commanders have claimed that Russian losses since December have exceeded the pace of new recruitment. Meduza’s own casualty research runs only to December 2025 and cannot confirm or refute that claim.
What to watch
Drone counts in the middle rear are a poor measure of where the war is heading. The real question is whether either side can build a combined-arms system that turns drone dominance into sustained advances, not 10-kilometer probes that stall when reserves arrive.
Both sides are working on it. While Russia trails in frontier AI development, its military has concentrated on adapting existing Western and Chinese models for specific drone applications — work that, according to analysts at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, is more advanced than Moscow’s public failures suggest. Moscow will attempt to replicate the Hornet-class capability. Kramatorsk and Sloviansk remain the de facto prize of the war, but neither side is closing in fast enough to suggest resolution in 2026. Ukraine’s 7th Airborne Assault Corps, holding the line between Pokrovsk and Dobropillia, has warned that a major Russian offensive aimed at cutting the Kramatorsk-Sloviansk garrison off from the main Ukrainian force has already begun. Russian forces, it says, currently hold the advantage in both infantry and drones in that sector.
The next major Russian offensive toward those cities will show whether the Pokrovsk experiment scales or stalls again.
No country can be free without independent media. In January 2023, the Russian authorities outlawed Meduza, banning our work in the country our colleagues call home. Just supporting Meduza carries the risk of criminal prosecution for Russian nationals, which is why we’re turning to our international audience for help. Your assistance makes it possible for thousands of people in Russia to read Meduza and stay informed. Consider a small but recurring contribution to provide the most effective support. Donate here.