Novaya Gazeta Europe: United Russia would have won just 34% in State Duma elections without ballot stuffing
Without fraud, United Russia would have won about 34% of the vote in the State Duma elections. The party’s official result — nearly 58% — was about 1.7 times that figure. Novaya Gazeta Europe reached this conclusion using calculations based on election analyst Sergey Shpilkin’s method.
Shpilkin’s method rests on the principle that adding large numbers of votes for one candidate increases both that candidate’s vote share and overall turnout. On a graph, polling stations with typical results form a relatively even cluster, while anomalous stations — where ballot stuffing is believed to have occurred — form a “comet tail” extending toward higher turnout and a larger vote share for the front-runner.
“This year, the cluster of fraud-free polling stations is centered at 34% of the vote for United Russia. That is probably what the result would have been without fraud,” Novaya Gazeta Europe said. Two election analysts agreed with its calculations, according to the outlet.
Sergey Shpilkin, a physicist, began analyzing Russian election statistics in 2007 using an approach developed by American diplomat John Brady Kiesling. Despite its limitations, many political scientists and journalists have used Shpilkin’s method to assess election fraud. Shpilkin’s home was searched in 2022, though he was already outside Russia at the time.
At Meduza, we are committed to transparency about our use of artificial intelligence in the newsroom. The story you’re reading was written by one of our living, breathing journalists and translated from Russian using an AI model configured to follow our strict editorial standards. This translation process is the result of extensive testing and refinements to ensure our English-language coverage is timely and accurate. A Meduza editor reviews every draft before publication.
If you find any errors in this translation, please contact us at reports@meduza.io.
To read Meduza’s exclusive content in English, please subscribe to our newsletter.
How did Novaya Gazeta Europe calculate this?
The newspaper assumed that votes for every party except United Russia were counted honestly. It also excluded Moscow from the analysis, since most voters there cast ballots through electronic remote voting, and left out several other regions where journalists suspect votes for other parties were systematically shifted to United Russia’s total.
What kind?
This method allows for estimating the volume of ballot-stuffing when this type of fraud significantly exceeds other kinds of violations and there is a significant number of precincts where votes are counted honestly. Shpilkin’s method also fails to account for situations where fraud occurs without artificially inflating voter turnout — for example, when votes are shifted from one candidate to another. Or when a protocol is simply “drawn up,” with numbers invented from scratch.
Who is this?
A historian, archaeologist, and American diplomat. Before entering the diplomatic service, Kiesling was an election observer and became the first person to analyze voting using graphs — specifically, looking at how the distribution of votes for candidates correlates with turnout. Physicist Sergey Shpilkin was later inspired by this approach when analyzing Russian elections.